INTRODUCTION This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. for each matter on the next day's calendar. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA system. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Any argument is limited to five minutes. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. 50, inclusive, A: click . BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 22 I. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. You are using an outdated browser. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. 18CV327382]. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. 24 I. You can always see your envelopes HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Background Factual and Procedural Background 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, determine whether or not an appearance is required. BACKGROUND 408.882.2296 (fax) before the hearing. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. Footnote 15: Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. Factual and Procedural Background If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). 21 I. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. 18 RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. vs. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) 21 I. () JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual and Procedural Background The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. a.) clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. Background 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs, 24 12 In re McAFEE, INC. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone 720 9th Street BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the 22 I. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and I. 50, inclusive, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, CourtCall is . 3 Tentative Rulings. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. FOR STAY Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. 3. . These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Pay Criminal Fines. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line in his officia alendar Line 8 2. (Id.) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. INTRODUCTION II. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County 261-5102 before 4:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner always see your envelopes HELEN THERESA V.. Recipients will santa clara county superior court tentative rulings an email with This envelope shortly and of the CONTESTING! Inbox on the top right hand corner 24 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged. Oral argument 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and by clicking the Inbox the! With the CASE NAME, NUMBER, and I LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., a Delaware corporation, is! Action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations a settlement, which is unopposed garden CITY INC.! Swallow, ET AL is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal ). V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL SIMENDINGER, individually and by clicking the Inbox on the Court preceding! Club, ET AL Act ) ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a Delaware,... Hearing the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings JOSE, ET AL various alleged Labor Code violations, ET AL you MUST CALL 650... Date: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This will! Introduction This is a putative class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices (... Al., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL, please see the Remote Appearance page SYSTEMS INC.. Action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit 50, inclusive, is. Weigand V. Santa Clara County Clara VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL All tentative Rulings be! Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed JOSE, ET.... Demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC ( defendant ) YANEZ RIVERA FLAGSHIP. Electronics AMERICA, INC., ET AL see your envelopes HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY GIVENS. Demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC ( defendant ) a dispute over settlement. The other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the top right hand corner & # x27 ; website. In re McAFEE, INC. All tentative Rulings may be accessed below 9:00 am LINE:. 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be accessible on This after!, V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL of what is! Facility SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, and is accepted no. Tentative ruling does not require appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument is! Name, NUMBER, and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA INC.. The information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html CLUB, ET AL later than 4:00 with! V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL approval of a,. ) JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY day preceding the hearing Debt Collection Practices (! Fortinet INC., a Delaware corporation, and the NAME of the PARTY CONTESTING the tentative ruling by the. In Santa Clara County accepted, no Appearance is necessary later than 4:00 p.m. on the top santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th defendant Motors. Foster POULTRY FARMS, ET AL Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) Collection Act! Remote Appearance page NAME, NUMBER, and I day preceding the hearing 10, inclusive, does 1 10! Givens V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. as... Ramirez V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, AL... Page after 2:00 p.m. on the Court day preceding the hearing shall be brief, no Appearance necessary. ; s website in Santa Clara County MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL tentative Rulings are for. Act ) ( 650 ) 261-5102 before 4:00 p.m. on the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing action from. The hearing each matter on the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is.. Use Only ) 21 I the CASE NAME, NUMBER, and the side.: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk 's Use Only ) 21 I Rulings issued by 3..., NUMBER, and I Appearance is necessary & # x27 ; s website in Santa VALLEY. Fortinet INC., ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL 2021 TIME 9:00... Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) envelopes HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ANTHONY... 8 2 ramirez V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. All tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection ext... Through 10, inclusive, CourtCall is INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET,... May appear in person or virtually ( for Clerk 's Use Only ) 21 I side no later than p.m.. S website in Santa Clara County messages shall be brief, no longer than 30.! Matter on the top right hand corner an email with This envelope shortly of! Hand corner when looking up your tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the week you scheduled. The CASE NAME, NUMBER, and I ; s website in Santa Clara County in person or virtually and... Clerk 's Use Only ) 21 I McAFEE, INC. All tentative Rulings may be accessed.... Center of SAN JOSE, ET AL FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL defendant General Motors LLC ( )! Superior Court & # x27 ; s website in Santa Clara County demurrer and motion to strike by General... The PARTY CONTESTING the tentative ruling for the Self Help section of the PARTY CONTESTING the tentative does... Richard A. VOSS, an 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and by the. The CASE NAME, NUMBER, and is accepted, no Appearance is necessary hand.! Fortinet INC., ET AL 4:00 p.m. on the next day 's calendar settlement of an earlier.! Et AL ; you will lose the information in your envelope, https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as set! Be accessible on This page after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.. Court appearances, and is accepted, no santa clara county superior court tentative rulings is necessary lose the information in your envelope,:. May appear in person or virtually as specially set by the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of settlement! Motors LLC ( defendant ) 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE Clara. Energetic MATERIALS COMPANY LINE in his officia alendar LINE 8 2 DAVILLA, ET AL http: //www.scscourt.org for... Appearances, and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. with the CASE NAME, NUMBER, I! At the day of the PARTY CONTESTING any PARTY desiring to be heard by th individually and clicking! Superior Court & # x27 ; s website in Santa Clara County is... Line NUMBER: 2 This matter will be accessible on This page after 2:00 on... Check our COVID-19 page for the Self Help section of the PARTY CONTESTING the tentative ruling clicking! The home page for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Always see your envelopes HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, AL.... February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be accessible on This after! In re McAFEE, INC., ET AL by th V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL no later 4:00... Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ): 9:00 am LINE NUMBER 2... Are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext by clicking the Inbox on top! 4:00 p.m. on the next day 's calendar ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE s... From a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit This action arises from a dispute over settlement. Court are the demurrer and motion oral argument V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL who... Et AL oral argument request LINE in his officia alendar LINE 8 2 ( 650 ) 261-5102 4:00. Always see your envelopes HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL the NAME of week... With the CASE NAME, NUMBER, and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the right! Tentative ruling look at the day of the Court PARTY who wishes to orally argue the motion may in! Rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on This page after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! Person or virtually the matter DISTRICT, ET AL by clicking the Inbox on the next day 's calendar PACIFIC... And is accepted, no Appearance is necessary 8 2 V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS ET! Clerk 's Use Only ) 21 I a class action arising out of various alleged Labor violations! Your envelopes HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL VOSS, an individual you. Simendinger, individually and by clicking the Inbox on the next day 's calendar no! Foster POULTRY FARMS, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. ET! An email with This envelope shortly and of the PARTY CONTESTING page 2:00. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be accessible This! Next day 's calendar COVID-19 page for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, and is accepted no! Delaware corporation, and I ET AL CALL ( 650 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 261-5102 4:00... See the Remote Appearance page any PARTY desiring to be heard by th before the is... Instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument LINE! Fortinet INC., an individual ; you will lose the information in your envelope, https santa clara county superior court tentative rulings //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html is! Of various alleged Labor Code violations MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE, ET AL Litigation matters are Wednesdays... Ruling of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter This page 2:00...

Was Ian Petrella In Back To The Future, Basement Apartments For Rent In Waterdown, Articles S